The UK's Society of Equestrian Artists forum for discussing all equestrian/equine art matters
You are not logged in.
I have almost finished my first attempt at oil painting, it has taken quite a while and I have been making it up as I go along. I have somebody who wants to exhibit it but it needs to be finished and varnished by the end of the month, and I only have 3 days free to do it so I think it will be unlikely. Also I've read that it takes about a year to dry completely. However, in Munnings' autobiography he writes that he completed a commission in 3 days, leaving it to dry overnight under the shelter of some rocks. Now I'm completely open to the idea that the man was some kind of god, but how did he manage this? I could do with a miracle right now!
Offline
First, the lecture.
The chemical side of oil painting is not like acrylics or other similar media. Oils are strong and long-lasting when used properly, but a disaster area if they aren't. You need to know exactly what you're doing with them, making it up as you go along just won't do with oils. This is even more the case if you want to sell them with integrity knowing they won't fall to bits.
You need to get and read a decent book, e.g.-
Emma Pearce's would be a start.
Artist's Materials: The Complete Sourcebook of Methods and Media
ISBN: 0572031467
and for more detail a modern updated edition of Mayer
ISBN: 0571143318
The Artist's Handbook of Materials and Techniques
(Both I have frequently mentioned before.)
Oils take, depending on thickness of paint, oil proportions used, types of oils used, and particular pigments used, between 3 months to a year to dry enough to be varnished- longer for very thick paint. (Pearce says at least a year, but that would be on a painting of average modern thickness. I work thin and lean, as a rule, so can do with less).
Lots of artists varnish earlier than recommended. My feeling is, on their own heads be it. If you want accurate advice on such things, you need to go to books such as the above, which are written by people who know about the chemical side. All sorts of artists do/have done all sorts of things, some sound, some unsound. Some get away with it, the majority don't. Munnings may have mixed varnish with his paints or done any number of other things which made his procedure appropriate, you just don't know, so titbits of information like this are dangerous to follow.
I, for example, have indeed (for a 'rush' job) handed a painting over when touch-dry, which takes from a day to a week, more if there is a lot of slow-drying pigment in it (i.e.Titanium White) or I have used alot of oil, etc. but only on the strict condition that it is kept in a suitable clean environment and is returned to me for varnishing at the appropriate time. He may have done the same. Unvarnished paintings are normally dull matt on the surface when drying, so one doesn't normally exhibit them until they are varnished.
If the painting is touch dry, some artists use 'retouching varnish'. I don't myself. Never 'oil out' instead as a substitute for varnishing, it offers no protection and just attracts fluff.
(Also, Munnings may have done this painting'alla prima' i.e. in one go. paintings done that way don't have problems with layer adhesion, and other problems which you may well have if you have been working on a painting with big time gaps between layers without preparing the dry layer you are about to work on appropriately. )
Last edited by Seth (2010-02-19 10:40:50)
Offline
If you want to cut drying time to a bare minimum, try using Alkyd oils instead. These will dry within hours unless you paint very thickly or are using a lot of certain colours like Alizarin Crimson (seems to take slightly longer, like titanium white) W&N do a good range which I use for almost all my work, reserving traditional oil for the final glazes, combined with Liquin, which gives a reasonable gloss on its own. I have used 'retouching varnish' myself on the odd occasion , but otherwise I leave things done with Alkyds for about 3 months to be on the safe side before varnishing.
Another option I gather is to underpaint in Acrylics, but this isn't something I've tried personally or would recommend - I hate the plastic stuff!
Offline
I undercoated my last painting in acrylics it worked a treat. Early days but been drying a month and so far so good.
Offline
Thanks! I did think it was a bit ambitious to be asked for it to be finished so soon, I thought the gallery owner might have known something I didn't! It did start as an experiment and ended up looking quite nice, which is why I had been making it up as I went, mostly with the composition rather than the chemical side - I've just really used the oils and the turps and added linseed oil for later layers, (That's ok, right....?) I think I should probably keep hold of it so I can make sure it's completely dry before varnishing. (And read up a hell of a lot more!) And probably not try to sell it in case it does fall apart. :-)
Offline
I would never use acrylics under oils, but other people do an they seem happy with it.
Everyone just has to decide for themselves about these things, but you should do what you do on the basis of the best information you can get so that at least you know what risks you are taking. And you also need to keep up, as new research evidence emerges over time- I buy new technical books on a regular basis.
But having said that, turps and linseed and fat over lean are pretty sound materials and methods.
Offline
Oh good, at least I'm doing something right
I am really really grateful for the advice (and telling off!
) As you may have gathered I am quite new to painting in general and haven't a clue what I'm doing. I was handed a set of oil paints in GCSE art and told to figure them out myself as the teacher didn't know how to use them. I know now there is a science to it but I did just assume they would be quite easy to work out by oneself. I will try to get hold of those books when I get hold of some money, I have one book on oils which I got in a charity shop called The Big Book of Oil Painting by Jose M Parramon. I don't know if anyone has it? In the meantime I will try to read as much as I can online and maybe stick to getting composition right first. Thanks again!
Last edited by elin (2010-02-20 21:52:59)
Offline
Also, while I'm on the subject, my canvas has gone a bit floppy in parts. Is there anything I can do about it or is it another thing which I need to learn from next time. (if so how do I prevent it?).
Offline
I haven't got a copy, but I know the book you mention and I seem to recall it being quite good and fairly comprehensive. Re the canvas - assuming it was a bought one, did you put the wedges in the back correctly? Took me ages at first to work out which way they are supposed to go in, and I remember having the same problem. ![]()
Offline
Oh
I must be like those people who call computer helplines and get told to plug it in to the wall. I didn't put the wedges in. They didn't seem to be wedging anything when I tried so I assumed they went in at the end. I'll get my coat...
Offline
Don't panic! Wedges may not be the answer.
If the canvas has been moved from a dry place to a more humid place, or the room it is in has got cold and dank, it will sag. If you take it back to the dry place, it will tighten again. Wedge it out when it is slack in that sort of case and it will end up too tight. A poor quality canvas may even tear; and/or the stretchers may warp.
If it has gone slack in one corner but not elsewhere, you may have bangged or dropped it on that corner. Gently tap the two wedges into that corner, and tap them out bit by bit until the corner matches the others. Remember it is much easier to tap wedges in than to get them out.
If it isn't a humidity thing, and it is general, then gently push all 8 wedges into the corners but ONLY until they are far enough in not to drop out. Do them all. If the canvas is still sagging (it takes very little wedging as a rule) then go round the whole canvas, doing one gentle tap with a light hammer on every wedge. If that isn't enough, go round again until it is back to the right tension.
When tapping wedges, you can slip a piece of card between the canvas and the corner of the frame to prevent your hammer slipping off and hitting the back of the canvas (which might bruise it into a hump or tear it).
As another option,you can also VERY VERY LIGHTLY mist water on the back (plant sprayer would do). Just enough to dampen it very slightly (I know this sounds contradictory, but stay with me on this one). If the canvas was prepared traditionally with size it may well tighten up and be okay.
The key to all this is do the minimum possible to get the canvas flat- so don't do anything unless you have checked it isn't just a temporary humidity change. Cheap canvas may even be vulnerable to splitting, so take it easy. (That's another reason for using good quality linen and not cotton.)
I don't put wedges in if I don't need to. They can drop out in storage if they haven't needed to be driven in and damage things next to them. So it isn't a case of 'did you switch it on?' ![]()
Last edited by Seth (2010-02-21 15:22:55)
Offline
PS it doesn't matter which way you put traditional wedges in. Some people put them in so the hitting surface is at right angles to the stretcher bar, but I do mine the other way, with the end of the wedge slanting, I find it easier to hit the wedge end square-on that way.
I think the slanting way is the traditional one, but I'd just do whatever was easiest for you.
Offline
Elin, the Pearce book is really good for beginners, it has photos of stuff like putting wedges in.
(She puts hers in the other way to the way I do it, I've just looked!)
Last edited by Seth (2010-02-21 15:26:56)
Offline
PPS wedges are sometimes called 'keys' in books, if you can't find them in an index under 'wedges'.
Offline
Thank you Seth. I have since bought the Pearce book and have already tried out a few of the tips, will read it cover to cover before I attempt anything else. The painting is nearly done and I will postit in the critique section as I would like some feedback on the whole thing.
Offline
If you want feedback, you had better post it sooner rather than later.
I don't do online critting myself, but I daresay someone may be around to help.
Offline
Ah well, I know what's wrong with it really so I don't suppose I need anyone else to tell me the same thing!
Just read in Emma Pearce's bbok that some pigments are non-permanent e.g Sap Green and should be substituted with other colours. If this is the case what is the point in selling them?
Offline
Some people like the colours, and if the problem is that they aren't lightfast, they may be perfectly fine for things like camera-ready work (work for reproduction, like illustration) or book illumination. They may be bad only when mixed with other specific colours, or only a problem in thin glazes. You just have to look stuff up!
Real sap green is a great colour in watercolour. The more permanent greens are pretty much all far too blue, that's one reason why people like it, esp. for sketching out of doors when you haven't as much time to mix things when trying to capture lighting effects. For sketches for reference rather than sale, or work in sketchbooks where it normally won't see much light, there's no reason not to use it if you want.
Some artists just don't care about permanence at all, and buy what they like the look of. Everyone has to decide for themselves.
I use Aizarin as there is no colour substitute, but you have to be careful with it- I use the most permanent ones (check the Pigment numbers and manufacturer's info) and usually avoid using it in very thin glazes, and at that point the risk is acceptable to me.
Some manufacturers try to match fugitive colous with mixes of more stable ones, so a Sap Green (Hue) may be fine. To find out what is in a colour, check the contents with the manufacturer by colour number and then look them up in Mayer.
Most ranges have stars or something on the tubes or their colour charts to roughly indicate permanence. The colour makers do tell us, but most artists just couldn't care less so don't even look....................I bet some manufacturers wonder why they bother half the time!
Last edited by Seth (2010-03-02 18:48:14)
Offline
PS Old Holland used to have a policy - I think they still do- where they don't sell oils made from pigments which are fugitive or which react badly with each other- so maybe their approach is more what you'd like- but they are pricey, be warned. I use their stuff, but I still check each Pig.no, and I do use some colours from other makers- which I check too.
Once you have worked out what you like to use and checked them all out, you don't have to keep bothering with all this all the time. It's just complicated to start with.
Offline